
(Written in April, 1994)
by Jim Heaphy
Last fall, I went into business
for myself, specializing in inspecting and repairing problem solid surface countertop
installations. After ten years of selling new countertops, it is an interesting change
to concentrate on repairing those that have failed. It has given me the opportunity
to see firsthand on a daily basis what happens all too often when fabricators and
installers let quality standards slip. It has also fortified my own commitment to
high quality workmanship, which has been the theme of this column from its beginning.
In
recent months, I have had the opportunity to inspect sixty kitchen countertop installations.
In most of these cases, I have been able to repair the damage, although a few of
the situations have been so serious that the countertops needed to be replaced. Some
interesting patterns have emerged that reinforce the importance of following the
manufacturer's fabrication and installation requirements to the letter.
In
over 90% of the cases I've seen, the complaint involves a crack of some sort. In
most of the other cases, the complaint involves new installations with workmanship
so poor that future cracks are almost inevitable unless the shortcomings are corrected.
The
most common problem I've seen, occurring in about 40% of the cases, is one or more
cracks originating at a cooking appliance. Nearly 80% of these involve drop-in cooktops,
although freestanding ranges and slide-in ranges are also involved occasionally.
As soon as the cooktop or range is removed, the problems that caused the
crack are almost always apparent. Usually, the cutout is just barely large enough
to allow installation of the appliance. When cooking takes place, the appliance expands,
pressing against the edge of the cutout. Heat transfers rapidly to the countertop,
leading to an increased risk of overheating. The proper procedure is to oversize
the cutout at least 1/8" on all sides, to isolate the countertop as much as
possible from the heat source. If the flange is wide enough, it is wise to oversize
the cutout even more than 1/8" on all sides.
In many cases, the cooktop
cutout has been made by drilling the four corners, and cutting the straight sections
with either a circular saw or a saber saw. Often, there is no sign that the edges
of the cutout have been sanded. This results in an unacceptably jagged edge that
is likely to crack under stress. The proper procedure is to machine the cutout with
a router guided by a template. The edges should then be rounded over to a radius
of at least 1/16", and all surfaces should be sanded smooth, using 150 grit
or finer abrasives.
It is important to have continuous wood supports beneath
the perimeter of the cooktop cutout, within 3" of the opening. However, these
supports should be kept at least 1" away from the edge of the cutout. If the
wood supports extend right up to the edge of the underside of the cutout, they will
act as insulators and inhibit the dissipation of excess heat. In many cases, I find
that these wood supports just below the edge of the cutout have contributed to the
crack and complicate the repair process. When I repair a crack, I try whenever possible
to add a solid surface reinforcing strip or block beneath the cracked area. This
is hard to do if a wood support extends right up to the edge of the cutout.
In
almost every cooktop cutout crack I've seen, the required aluminum conductive tape
is either missing or applied incorrectly. This aluminum tape helps move excess heat
away from the area of the operating burners, spreading heat around the perimeter
of the cutout. When installed properly, the tape covers the entire horizontal surface
below the flange, the vertical surface of the cutout, and dangles into the opening
below. It therefore acts like a radiator vane, shedding excess heat into the air
below the cooktop. When the tape is present, it often does not extend out to the
edge of the flange, or is wrapped up underneath the countertop. Another common error
is to substitute a lighter gauge of cheaper aluminum tape, which is therefore less
effective as a heat conductor. In one case, an installer used duct tape, which is
not a conductive tape, and an 18" long crack resulted.
One discouraging
trend is that in over 40% of the cooktop cracks that I've seen, there was an unsuccessful
previous repair attempt. This leads me to believe that cooktop cracks are especially
difficult to repair with assurance that the same problem will not develop again.
However, I tend to be more thorough in my repair efforts then previous repair people
have been - I always enlarge the corner radii, round over all edges and sand all
surfaces smooth, and add reinforcing blocks in the corners whenever this is practical.
I install new aluminum tape properly. Therefore, I hope that I will be able to achieve
a higher success rate.
The second most common failure I've seen, accounting
for 25% of the cases, is the seam separation - a straight crack that follows a seam
on the horizontal countertop surface. The causes of this type of failure may not
always be as glaringly obvious as in the case of the cooktop cracks, but certain
problems do show up over and over. These seams should always have some sort of continuous
reinforcement beneath them. In the past, this might have been a strip of plywood.
Current standards call for a second layer of solid surface material beneath the seam,
fastened with a layer of joint adhesive. When I look at the underside of a seam that
has failed, often I find no seam support at all, and I can see gaps and voids where
adhesive has leaked out of the seam. Such a seam may look fine on the top surface
just after installation, but is much more likely to fail later on.
Seam location
is also important. It is poor practice to locate a seam directly into an inside corner,
which is an area of increased stress. Instead, the offset seam method should be used,
moving the seam at least 1" away from the inside corner. Care should also be
taken when locating a seam near or through a heat source. Seams above dishwashers
and undercounter ovens and through cooktops should be avoided if possible, and assembled
with great caution and adequate reinforcements if they are absolutely necessary.
Edge buildup pieces that are not properly fitted to one another can also contribute
to seam failures. These pieces should be of the same depth, and should be cut square
and well-filled with adhesive where they butt into one another.
The good news
about seam separations is that it appears that repairs are successful in most cases.
I've yet to see a second repair required of a straightforward seam failure.
As
already mentioned, inside corners are well-known as a potential problem area. Over
20% of the problems I've seen involve cracks originating at inside corners. The general
rule is to create the largest radius possible at each inside corner, consistent with
the kitchen design. At the front edge, 1/2" is now considered the minimum acceptable
radius. This principle applies not only to the inside corners where the front edges
of sections of "L" and "U" shaped countertops come together.
It is also important when a countertop wraps around the corner of a wall into a greenhouse
window, for example. If this corner is cut square, a crack can start that is particularly
difficult to repair. It isn't possible to maneuver a router all the way to the wall
where such a crack starts, and it is very difficult to reinforce this type of repair
from below.
So far, about 25% of the inside corner cracks that I've seen
involve a second crack that has previously been repaired. Therefore the success rate
seems to fall somewhare between the excellent results seen with seam separations,
and the more mixed results seen with cooktop cutout cracks.
A poor quality
countertop support structure is a factor that frequently contributes to failures.
At one extreme, I've seen quite a few tops installed over solid underlayment, which
are often overglued. Portable heat-producing appliances, such as electric frying
pans, can then more easily overheat the countertop, because the solid underlayment
acts as an insulating blanket below the top. The result is often an audible bang
as the top cracks while the homeowner is cooking. Customers should be provided with
trivets made from cutouts for their portable cooking devices. These trivets will
help prevent cracks, and can be used as color-matching patch material if a crack
should occur.
At the other extreme, I've seen tops installed on a flimsy
and poorly leveled hodgepodge of shims and loose blocks. This lack of continuous,
flat perimeter support can lead to seam separations or inside corner cracks due to
shearing stresses. The proper way to install solid surface countertops is on a continuous,
sound, flat perimeter support structure of wood strips that exposes most of the underside
of the tops to free air circulation. The tops should be attached with a flexibe adhesive
used sparingly. Silicone sealant is the best. This allows for slight expansion and
contraction due to temperature changes, without creating excessive stresses in the
countertop.
In about 90% of the cases I've seen, the overall appearance of
the countertops before the problem occurred was good. Usually, the tops are accurately
sized, nicely finished, and fitted neatly to the walls. Decorative edges most often
look fine. The home owner has no inkling of a problem until they notice a crack.
From this, I conclude that most fabricators have the skills to produce good-looking
installations that will be accepted by the customers as visually pleasing. It doesn't
take any greater skill level to fabricate and install the tops in a structurally
sound fashion at the same time. Instead, it is a matter of training, personal responsibility,
quality control, and pride in the hidden aspects of one's workmanship. These are
essential to long-term success in this line of work.